Photo of Stephen Parsley

Stephen Parsley practices primarily in the Banking and Financial Services Practice Group, where he assists clients with complex and dispositive motions, appeals, compliance, and general strategy.

Stephen has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts, including several oral arguments before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to his extensive appellate experience, he often assists clients at the trial level by briefing motions. Stephen strives to keep the big picture in view for his clients by not only winning individual cases, but promoting client interests across the range of relevant legal and business issues. View articles by Stephen

In the wild new world of TCPA litigation following the end of binding deference to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), one of the more salient questions is whether the Do-Not-Call (DNC) Registry’s protections extend to the sending of text messages. Florida finds itself at ground zero for this debate after three different federal district courts

On September 8, 2025, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) released Bulletin 2025-22, announcing that the OCC will assess an entity’s debanking practices when considering licensing filings and applications and during Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) assessments. National banks and federal savings associations are now on notice that prior allegations of politicized

Late last year, we predicted that the Trump administration would bring federal action to target de-banking, and on August 7, 2025, President Trump signed a much-anticipated executive order to address the issue. Banks and credit unions should now expect to feel the impact early on in the form of horizontal reviews and inquiries from their

The Supreme Court’s June 2025 decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corp. has upended the long-settled framework for Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) compliance and litigation. As we discussed in our rundown of the decision, by holding that courts are no longer required to defer to FCC interpretations of the TCPA, McLaughlin invites

On June 20, 2025, the Supreme Court issued perhaps the most momentous decision in Telephone Consumer Protection Act history with McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corp. This landmark ruling jettisons decades of established practice that bound district courts to follow the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretations of the TCPA.

TCPA litigation has already been

After years of denying review, the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — agreed to address the question of whether New York’s momentous Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) applies retroactively. On May 20, 2025, the New York Court of Appeals accepted review of two (2) cases that present challenges to Section

Starting July 1, 2025, Idaho will subject financial institutions with total assets over a certain threshold to new restrictions under the Transparency in Financial Services Act. The law follows a growing trend among states seeking to ensure fair access to banking and prevent financial denials based on political, religious, or ideological factors — often known

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has a new rule under the TCPA for revocation of consent for robocalls and text messages set to go into effect on April 11, 2025. This rule is designed to give consumers greater control over their ability to withdraw consent for marketing communications. Businesses that use text messaging and

The start of the second Trump administration is fast approaching, and it raises prospects of a renewed push for federal-level fair access to banking requirements. The first Trump administration came close to enacting such a regulation in its last weeks, but the rule was halted by the Biden administration. The financial services industry should not