Listen to this post

Starting July 1, 2025, Idaho will subject financial institutions with total assets over a certain threshold to new restrictions under the Transparency in Financial Services Act. The law follows a growing trend among states seeking to ensure fair access to banking and prevent financial denials based on political, religious, or ideological factors — often known as “de-banking.” Idaho’s statute has much in common with laws passed in Tennessee and Florida (which we covered here) over the past two years.

Covered Institutions and Activities

Like Tennessee (but unlike Florida), Idaho’s statute is crafted to target only larger institutions. Covered financial institutions include:

  • Banks with over $100 billion in total assets; and
  • Payment processors, credit card networks, or other payment service providers that processed over $100 billion in transactions in the previous year.

Idaho’s law extends beyond Idaho-chartered institutions, as national banks are specifically covered.

The law applies to any decision involving financial services, which is defined in general terms as “any financial product or service.” This presumably includes the full spectrum of lending, deposits, payments, and other activities offered by the covered institutions.

Prohibited Discrimination Based on “Social Credit Scores”

At the heart of the statute is a prohibition on financial institutions using “social credit scores” to deny or restrict “financial services.” The law defines “social credit scores” broadly, and it includes any analysis or rating that penalizes:

  • Religious beliefs or practices;
  • Political expression or associations;
  • Failure to conduct diversity, equity, or gender-based audits;
  • Refusal to assist employees in obtaining abortions or gender reassignment services; and/or
  • Lawful business activities in the fossil fuel or firearms sectors.

The statute allows institutions to apply financial risk-based standards to firearms and fossil fuel businesses, but only if the standards are impartial, quantifiable, and disclosed to customers.

New Explanation Requirement

If a financial institution denies or restricts services, an Idaho customer can request a written explanation. The institution must respond within 14 days and provide:

  • A detailed basis for the decision;
  • A copy of the applicable terms of service; and
  • Specific contract provisions that justify the denial.

Enforcement and Private Rights of Action

Violations of the Transparency in Financial Services Act are treated as violations of Idaho’s Consumer Protection Act. The state attorney general may investigate violations and initiate enforcement actions. But the statute also creates a private right of action: Individuals harmed by violations can sue directly and seek remedies under Idaho’s consumer protection framework.

Preparing for Compliance

Financial institutions covered by the law should begin preparing in advance of the July 1, 2025, effective date. Key steps include:

  1. Evaluating whether service denial or risk assessment practices may encompass any of the prohibited “social credit” criteria.
  2. Familiarizing compliance teams with the law’s requirements to ensure they understand the distinctions between legal risk management and impermissible discrimination.
  3. Assigning personnel to process and respond to customer requests for explanation in a timely fashion.

A National Trend to Watch

Idaho is now the third state to pass a fair access to banking law, and it may not be the last. Financial institutions should give careful thought to their policies and models insofar as they touch on the hot-button activities and issues that animate the de-banking debate.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Stephen Parsley Stephen Parsley

Stephen Parsley practices primarily in the Banking and Financial Services Practice Group, where he assists clients with complex and dispositive motions, appeals, compliance, and general strategy.

Stephen has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts, including several oral arguments before the…

Stephen Parsley practices primarily in the Banking and Financial Services Practice Group, where he assists clients with complex and dispositive motions, appeals, compliance, and general strategy.

Stephen has litigated hundreds of cases in federal and state courts, including several oral arguments before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In addition to his extensive appellate experience, he often assists clients at the trial level by briefing motions. Stephen strives to keep the big picture in view for his clients by not only winning individual cases, but promoting client interests across the range of relevant legal and business issues. View articles by Stephen

Photo of F. Wendell Allen F. Wendell Allen

Wendell Allen’s practice is focused on litigation, defense of enforcement actions, and regulatory compliance services with a concentration in the representation of financial institutions in matters involving government enforcement actions, regulatory compliance disputes, and real property controversies in state and federal courts across…

Wendell Allen’s practice is focused on litigation, defense of enforcement actions, and regulatory compliance services with a concentration in the representation of financial institutions in matters involving government enforcement actions, regulatory compliance disputes, and real property controversies in state and federal courts across the country. As a litigator, Wendell routinely represents banks, mortgage servicers and other financial institutions in claims involving alleged violations of RESPA, TILA, FDCFA, FCRA, and a variety of common law, tort claims.